20 September 2018 Akshay Sewlikar, England & Wales; IndiaTags
In Reliance Industries v Union of India  EWHC 822 Reliance Industries Limited and BG Exploration and Production India Limited (the “Claimants”) challenged awards made in favour of the Union of India (the “Government”) under the Arbitration Act 1996 (the “AA 1996”). The English High Court (the “Court”) had the opportunity to consider the issue of the applicability of the foreign act of state doctrine to English seated arbitration proceedings.
View full article
13 September 2018 Kirstin Schwedt, EuropeTags
In a detailed decision, an ICSID tribunal hearing a dispute between Swedish Vattenfall and Germany over the state’s phase out of nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima disaster (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/12) has maintained jurisdiction to hear the dispute under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”). The decision follows objections raised by Germany after the Achmea-judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). We have previously reported on implications of Achmea for ECT-claims and the European Commissions’ view of the Achmea-judgment here.
View full article
31 August 2018 Akshay Sewlikar, England & Wales; IndiaTags
In Hardy v Government of India and IIFC (UK)  EWHC 1916 (Comm), the English Commercial Court discharged an interim third-party debt order awarded to support an oil and gas company’s UNCITRAL award against India. The Court refused to grant a final order because the debt was situated in India and Indian law would not recognise an English third-party debt order. Additionally, the jurisdictional requirement under CPR Rule 72.2 that the relevant debt must be “due or accruing due” was not met.
View full article
English High Court considers the interpretation of an arbitration clause written in a foreign language
A recent decision of the English High Court provides important guidance about the interpretation of arbitration clauses under English law when first written in a foreign language. The essence of the judgment is that, where the translation is contested, any ambiguity should be resolved by standard methods of contractual construction.
22 August 2018 Stephen Lacey, England & Wales; EuropeView full article
ICSID releases draft of new rules
The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has published the proposed amendments to its rules. The proposals mark the latest development in ICSID’s rule amendment project which aims to modernise the ICSID rules and make the dispute resolution process more time and cost effective and less paper-intensive. ICSID describes the proposed changes as the most far-reaching amendments in 50 years.
16 August 2018 Sadie Buls, Asia-Pacific; Europe; Latin America; Middle East; North AmericaView full article
New Ruling by the Madrid High Court of Justice: Arbitration and Public Policy
On 5 April 2018, the Civil and Criminal Chamber of the Madrid High Court of Justice (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid, TSJM) set aside an arbitral award as contrary to public policy, because the challenged award contained “an unreasonable assessment of the evidence and unreasonable failure to apply applicable rules”.
10 August 2018 Emma Morales, Europe; SpainView full article
English commercial court considers requirement for party to be given fair opportunity to respond
In the recent decision of Grindrod Shipping v Hyundai Merchant Marine  EWHC 1284, the English Commercial Court considered the degree to which issues relied upon by the tribunal must have been put before it; in particular, whether points raised by one of the parties in one context can be deployed by the tribunal in another. The short answer is that there is no problem with this, provided the issues can be said to have been “in play” so as to give the other a fair opportunity to respond.
07 August 2018 Sadie Buls; Stephen Lacey, England & Wales; EuropeView full article